Reaction of Mark Sanchez

Mark Sanchez deal, Jets "front office as a problem twice, on Monday night, had made a terrible decision. Cut me, Sanchez almost seemed to solve them.Take 7 minutes 26 seconds for three to five turnovers and - knock them out of contention Jets Tennessee playoff loss in '14-10 stakes his performance of his career, the most discouraging, it happened.

On one level, admirable, stupid on so many others - is invalid, and even Jets coach Rex Ryan came stubborn support for their folly created a situation untenable. Those who show up at MetLife Stadium on Sunday - the uprising began against San Diego if Sanchez can be as weak on Tuesday decided to demote him in favor of the Jets, Greg McElroy realized that perhaps their fans.

Owner Woody Johnson, during the last month, as he sees fit, even if Sanchez is present to the future, the Jets' went from the foundation. He may soon be the past?

In any other case, the answer is definitely yes. His regression - since the beginning of 2011, 50 turnovers, among NFL quarterbacks, including 24 this season - as I can guarantee that. - Guaranteed $ 8,250,000 in 2013 - no matter how bad it will be up to Sanchez to earn money for the players to play: But to complicate matters somewhat rhetorical question on the agenda of its contractual blocker?

From a practical perspective, the Jets have a financial incentive to reduce it a bit. He signed with another team, if you want to cover the cost of any contract offset Sanchez is guaranteed, the amount will be responsible for all the Jets.

The process of negotiating contracts and salary cap for the Green Bay Packers spent 10 seasons with the NFL and now Andrew Brandt, ESPN business analyst, then he would pay a willing partner if I could find, Sanchez Jets, it will just be bad business exit strategy.

Jets Brandt theory, he said, would be more palatable to deal with a possible bonus that can convert part of his salary for 2013 Sanchez said.In other words, there is a lot of money for players in any case, less is not our starter, "$ 20.5 million in December, it ensures that the application for a new agreement, which was signed in 2012 and 2013 Brand said Sanchez." Now it is different, please change the course. They should have been ready to talk about sunk costs. '

Take the example of Seattle. The Seahawks paid $ 10 million this season, Matt Flynn, the backup to Russell Wilson put reaping the benefits. Or at least one of a word - it is difficult to secure a job or to start and Sanchez is still the basis for the later players are more likely to be reliable.

Obviously, now the Jets underestimated their projections Sanchez. They hoped that this would be productive in 2016. He did not even last through 2012.